The president said Rittenhouse was “violently attacked.” To assess whether that’s true, it’s helpful to know that two of the men accused of doing the violent attacking (Anthony Huber and Rosenbaum) were previously accused in criminal courts of violently attacking people. The adult men shot were all confronting, attacking or chasing Rittenhouse, a 17-year-old. That’s interesting: a newspaper censoring facts readers need to fully understand the context surrounding shootings in which a credible claim of self defense has been made. The journal sentinel headline on the records of joseph d. 2, the Journal Sentinel, Wisconsin’s largest daily newspaper, countered with an article titled, “ Why we aren’t reporting on the records of the victims of the Kenosha protest shooting.” Our headline on the criminal records of joseph d. 28, we wrote an opinion piece titled, “ Why We’ve Decided to Tell You the Criminal Records of the Men Shot in Kenosha.” That’s especially true in the case of Rosenbaum, a 36-year-old adult sex offender out on bail for battery and bail jumping accusations, who, a case can be made, was the instigator the night that Kyle Rittenhouse, a juvenile without a criminal history, opened fire.Īrizona courts ordered Rosenbaum, who was accused of molesting and/or engaging in inappropriate sexual activity with five boys, to have “no contact with minors under the age of 18 without permission from the Court.” Rittenhouse was 17, and Rosenbaum was chasing him when shot. Rosenbaum, Anthony Huber, and Gaige Grosskreutz is just plain wrong and harms the search for the truth.
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s decision to censor the criminal records of Joseph D. Read all of our Rittenhouse exclusives here. Update: A Wisconsin jury found Rittenhouse not guilty of all charges on Nov.
0 kommentar(er)
